Jul 22, 2019   11:41 a.m. Magdaléna
Academic information system

Persons at STU

This page displays all publicly accessible information about the desired person. Some information about the person's occupation and offices may be hidden.

doc. Ing. Zora Petráková, PhD.
Identification number: 755
University e-mail: zora.petrakova [at] stuba.sk
Docentka CSc.,PhD. - The Institute for Forensic Engineering (FCE)
Institute chief official - The Institute for Forensic Engineering (FCE)

Contacts     Lesson     Projects     Publications     Bodies     Supervised theses     

Basic information

Basic information about a final thesis

Type of thesis: Diploma thesis
Thesis title:value management of construction building
Written by (author): Ing. Éva Kovács
Department: Institute of Management of the STU (OUP REK)
Thesis supervisor: doc. Ing. Zora Petráková, PhD.
Opponent:Ing. Ján Ravász
Final thesis progress:Final thesis was successfully defended.

Additional information

Additional information about the final thesis follows. Click on the language link to display the information in the desired language.

Language of final thesis:Slovak

Slovak        English

Title of the thesis:value management of construction building
Summary:The aim of my diploma work is complex examination of energetic and economic evaluation of building object. My aim is to point out the fact that we can use the same principles of energetic object in reconstruction of old building object. The subject of analysis is family house, builded in the 70th. According to static point of view the building object is up to standard for future use, so the investor had chosen the reconstruction. The original building constructions, such as external cladding, ceiling construction and flooring, were not up to standard in point of view of thermal technical criteria. I suggested additional coating, where we had to monitor thermal resistance of all constructions. I based my analysis on three variants. The first one serves only as a comparison, where we didn't make any changes, or innovations. In the next three variants I used different thermal insulating material which were of different thickness. Then I suggested window and entrance door renewal and also central heating renewal, but these investment costs remained the same in all three variants. In my analysis I followed the specified standards. Suggestions are gauged according to results of calculating part. From the economic point of view I targed on the evaluation of efficiency of building object. Here I took into consideration the purchase costs as well as operating costs, during the time of twenty years of using the building object. Another step is comparison of all variants in terms of economic return. The last method of evaluation is determination of usual value of property, where I took into consideration design, economic life of the object. From my point of view, I think it's important to meet investor's requirements, so to project the best variant.
Key words:thermal technical, economic, energetic

Current level of public release
access to annotation and abstracts of final thesis only. Contacts are provided if the author or the supervisor does not wish to release the whole thesis. The author can state his contact details (optional)..

Display and download files

To display the final thesis assignment form click on the Display the final thesis assignment form icon. The following icons - Final thesis, Thesis appendices, Supervisor's review, Opponent's review - relate to the final thesis and can be downloaded. They could be displayed on condition they have been inserted and are available publicly.

Display the assignment form

Parts of thesis with postponed release:

Final thesis (final thesis appendices) unlimited
Reviews for final thesis unlimited